Dirty Minds: How Our Brains Influence Love, Sex, and Relationships</strong> Kayt Sukel is a passionate science writer and the author of "Dirty Minds: How our brains influence love, sex and relationships
An edgy, irreverent book by Kayt Sukel that examines all the ways our neurons can wreak havoc with our hearts.

By Kayt Sukel (CNN) As background research for my book, “Dirty Minds: How our brains influence love, sex and relationships,” I participated in a study at Rutgers University where scientists measured the activity in my brain as I self-stimulated to an orgasm in an MRI scanner.

During the course of my research for “Dirty Minds,” I asked neuroscientific researchers about the greatest challenges involved in studying human sexuality. I expected to hear concerns about finding study participants willing to be honest about their sex lives or if what was learned in the laboratory could really be applied to real-world behaviors.

But unanimously, the scientists I talked to said their greatest challenge was finding research grants and financial support for their work. Because so many of us are peevish about the study of sex, funding agencies can be, too. But none of us should be. Human sexuality is important – and its study is something we should all get behind. Because we can’t begin to have discussions about how to best deal with problems concerning sexual behavior, sexual function and sexual intimacy until we have a better handle on what’s normal.

Time and time again, I’m asked how I managed to have an orgasm in an fMRI scanner. But that’s not the right question. The important question is why I had an orgasm in an fMRI scanner. And that’s to help further our understanding of orgasm and human sexuality. When I say I came for the science — I mean it. And it’s my hope that more people will do the same in the future.

via Why I orgasmed in an MRI scanner – – CNN.com Blogs.

 January 27, 2012  Posted by Jules Siegel at 8:38 am No Responses »
 

By Katie Moisse (ABC News) A Florida woman was rushed by helicopter to an Alabama burn center after her face caught fire during routine surgery.

Kim Grice, a 29-year-old mother of three, was having cysts removed from her head at an outpatient surgery center in Crestview, Fla., when the flash fire erupted.

The cause of the fire is still under investigation. But surgical fires are usually sparked by heat, often from tools like lasers, and then fueled by alcohol, surgical drapes and oxygen. Grice was wearing a non-rebreathable oxygen mask, according to Traylor.

In October, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration launched an initiative to curb surgical fires through increasing awareness and promoting risk reduction practices.

“There are between 550 and 650 surgical fires a year,” said Mark Bruley, vice president for accident and forensic investigation for the ECRI Institute, adding that fewer than 30 of them result in patient injuries.

via Fire Erupts on Woman’s Face During Routine Surgery – ABC News.

 December 1, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 5:54 pm No Responses »
 

By John Ingold (Denver Post) The passage of state medical-marijuana laws is associated with a subsequent drop in the rate of traffic fatalities, according to a newly released study by two university professors.

The study — by University of Colorado Denver professor Daniel Rees and Montana State University professor D. Mark Anderson — found that the traffic-death rate drops by nearly 9 percent in states after they legalize marijuana for medical use. The researchers arrived at that figure, Rees said, after controlling for other variables such as changes in traffic laws, seat-belt usage and miles driven. The study stops short of saying the medical-marijuana laws cause the drop in traffic deaths.

Rees and Anderson say their study does not mean it is safer to drive stoned than drunk. Instead, they write, increased medical-marijuana usage at home might change patterns of substance use and driving.

Mason Tvert, the head of the pro- marijuana-legalization group SAFER, said the study suggests legalizing marijuana would be beneficial in unexpected ways.

“People who are drinking drive faster, take more risks, underestimate how impaired they are,” he said.

via Report shows fewer traffic fatalities after states pass medical-pot laws – The Denver Post.

 November 30, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 1:04 pm No Responses »
 

(DoctorTipster) A strain of avian influenza H5N1 genetically modified to be extremely contagious has been created by researcher Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands. The work was first presented at a conference dedicated to influenza, that took place in September in Malta.

Avian influenza emerged in Asia about 10 years ago. Since then there were fewer than 600 infection cases reported in humans. On the other hand, Fouchier’s genetically modified strain is extremely contagious and dangerous, killing about 50% of infected patients. The former strain did not represent a global threat, as transmission from human to human is rare. Or, at least, it was before Fouchier genetically modified it.

via Dutch Researcher Created A Super-Influenza Virus With The Potential To Kill Millions.

 November 28, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 8:12 pm No Responses »
 

(AllGov) Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles is refusing to grant a liver transplant to a cancer patient because he used medical marijuana, which not only is legal under California law but also was prescribed by a Cedars doctor.

Diagnosed with inoperable liver cancer in 2009, Norman B. Smith, 63, has been treated at Cedars-Sinai by oncologist Steven Miles, who approved medicinal marijuana in part to help his patient cope with the effects of chemotherapy. Smith became eligible for a liver transplant last year, but was removed from the list in February after testing positive for marijuana.

via AllGov – News – L.A. Hospital Denies Liver Transplant to Medical Marijuana User Despite Prescription from Its own Doctor.

 November 21, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 11:31 am No Responses »
 

By Adam Bernstein (Washington Post) Loren R. Mosher, 70, who died of liver cancer July 10 at a clinic in Berlin, was a contrarian psychiatrist and schizophrenia expert who was dismissed from the National Institute of Mental Health for his controversial theories on treatment.

While chief of NIMH’s Center for the Study of Schizophrenia from 1968 to 1980, Dr. Mosher decried excess drugging of the mentally ill. He eventually established small, drug-free treatment facilities that were more akin to homes than hospitals.

Creating Soteria House in the early 1970s, he said, caused lasting trouble with the psychiatric community. After showing studies of patient recovery that matched traditional treatment with medication, the project lost its funding amid a strong peer backlash. So did a second residential treatment center in San Jose.

via Contrarian Psychiatrist Loren Mosher, 70 (washingtonpost.com).

 November 19, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 11:36 am No Responses »
 

By Robert Sanders (UC California, Berkeley) University of California, Berkeleyscientists have shown that ionized plasmas like those in neon lights and plasma TVs not only can sterilize water, but make it antimicrobial – able to kill bacteria – for as long as a week after treatment.

A brief spark in air produces a low-temperature plasma of partially ionized and dissociated oxygen and nitrogen that will diffuse into nearby liquids or skin, where they can kill microbes similar to the way some drugs and immune cells kill microbes by generating similar or identical reactive chemicals. (Courtesy of Steve Graves)

Devices able to produce such plasmas are cheap, which means they could be life-savers in developing countries, disaster areas or on the battlefield where sterile water for medical use – whether delivering babies or major surgery – is in short supply and expensive to produce.

“We know plasmas will kill bacteria in water, but there are so many other possible applications, such as sterilizing medical instruments or enhancing wound healing,” said chemical engineer David Graves, the Lam Research Distinguished Professor in Semiconductor Processing at UC Berkeley. “We could come up with a device to use in the home or in remote areas to replace bleach or surgical antibiotics.”

Low-temperature plasmas as disinfectants are “an extraordinary innovation with tremendous potential to improve health treatments in developing and disaster-stricken regions,” said Phillip Denny, chief administrative officer of UC Berkeley’s Blum Center for Developing Economies, which helped fund Graves’ research and has a mission of addressing the needs of the poor worldwide.

Continue reading »

 November 16, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 4:45 am No Responses »
 

By Linda Searing (Washington Post) This study involved 623 children who were born in the mid-1980s weighing 4.4 pounds or less. Their health was assessed periodically, including screening for autism spectrum disorders at age 16 and evaluations to confirm the diagnosis, using standardized measures, at age 21. Overall, 5 percent of the youths had autism spectrum disorder diagnoses, a rate described as five times that found in the general U.S. population. The lower the birth weight, the higher the likelihood of an autism diagnosis, with a 10.6 percent prevalence among those who weighed 3.3 pounds at birth and a 3.7 percent prevalence at 4.4 pounds.

Source: November issue of Pediatrics

via Autism diagnosis is found to be more common in those who weighed least at birth – The Washington Post.

 November 8, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 7:48 am No Responses »
 

By Bevi Chagnon I’m a federal contractor who helps US government agencies produce, update, maintain, and publish those regulations you’re talking about. I’ve read tens of thousands of pages of regulations from just about every federal agency here in Washington DC, and I have never found even one regulatory point that I thought was unrealistic for a company to deploy and abide by.

I say this as a die-hard capitalist, 4th-generation business owner with an MBA (concentration in finance).

If you have it, please show me documented proof that a government regulation caused a company to either cease its operations or lay off its employees. I’d love to have it for my records.

I believe that the American public is being spin-doctored about jobs and regulations. Reducing regulations won’t create more jobs. Sure, a corporation will save money by dumping toxic waste into a river rather than following EPA and NIOSH HazMat regulations, but I’ll bet that the saved money ends up in the paychecks and perqs for the CEOs and the dividends to stockholders. Because of our arcane tax laws and human greed, profits are not used to hire more employees or reduce the prices of a company’s products. On a corporate balance sheet, profits get siphoned out to the CEOs and stockholders in one way or another because otherwise the profits get taxed now before a company gets the chance to use them later to hire more employees.

Increasing a company’s profits by removing the costs of regulations will do nothing to increase the customer base. It will just increase the profits which will then will have to be distributed to the CEOs and shareholders to minimize taxes. No wonder these guys give heavily to election campaigns and spin doctors.

Jobs are created when a company has a product/service to sell plus a willing prospective customer base (or market) with enough money to purchase stuff plus enough corporate cash to jump-start the product/service.

But every industry has had a drastic reduction in its prospective customer base over the past 4 years (big corporations to small mom-and-pops, every business I consult with has seen this). It’s fairly well known that people are not purchasing at the same level as they did 4 years ago. Even sales of Apple’s iPhone 4S are below analysts expectations, and this is a “charmed” product from a “golden” corporation.

A better long-term solution would be to develop ways to:

  1. Put more money in the hands of consumers (both individuals and business consumers) so that they purchase more stuff;
  2. Help companies develop new products and services that consumers will want to purchase; and,
  3. Revise our tax laws and provide a method for companies to retain profits tax-free (or low-tax) for a period of time IF they increase the number of US employees within a specified time period and keep the jobs here in the US for x-years. If they don’t hire US employees with that money, then they’ll be retro-taxed on it. And if they take the jobs overseas too soon, they’ll be retro-taxed on it.

An example: for the past 2 years I’ve tried to stockpile a cash reserve so that I could hire a full- or part-time employee and know that I had the reserve to cover expenses. Both years I wasn’t able to stockpile enough and it was taxed as profit. Heavily taxed as profit, so much so that it took a big chunk of the reserve I had developed. Consequently, I still don’t have the reserve I need to hire someone and I’m now in year 3 without the extra employee I need.

In the end I think we can all agree that things suck right now. But I don’t think that deregulation—whether it’s deregulation of the finance industry or reducing environmental/manufacturing regulations—are a solution. Any money that’s saved will not trickle down to you, me, or anyone outside of the board room.

 October 23, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 9:13 am No Responses »
 

By Neeraj Thakur (DNA) A man becomes truly great for humankind and his passing away deserves mass mourning only if he has done something to better the lives of his fellow beings, overcoming personal greed and lust for power.While all of us take our newborn kids to have ‘Do boond zindagi ki’, to save our kids from the life-crippling polio virus, very few would know why those life drops come for free.

There are many other diseases, medication for which does not come even at a reasonable cost, forget having it free.The man who invented the polio vaccine, Jonas Edward Salk, decided not to patent his invention.

After seven years of rigorous research, when he had the chance to become a billionaire, much like Jobs did, he refused to do so. When someone asked him ‘Who owns the patent of the vaccine, he replied, ‘Can anyone patent the sun?’ In civilisation’s history of one individual bettering the lives of fellow humans, can Jobs stand anywhere close to Salk?

Jobs did not even eradicate poverty with the immense wealth he accumulated by selling his so-called great products, invented by scientists who worked in his company. Instead, he rather stopped all philanthropist activity by Apple in 1997, saying philanthropy can ‘wait until we are profitable.’ Today, Apple is one of the world’s most valued companies sitting on $40 billion cash and ironically, it is perhaps the only one in its category that has no philanthropic contribution worth talking about.

via Comment: Steve Jobs wasn’t great; he wasn’t even close – Analysis – DNA.

 October 11, 2011  Posted by Jules Siegel at 7:27 am No Responses »