By  Melissa Boteach (ThinkProgress) Ann Romney has tweeted, “All moms are entitled to choose their path.” But unfortunately for low-wage working moms and nearly half of private sector workers, the” choice” is either “go to work and send my sick kid to school” or “stay at home with my sick child and risk losing my job or needed income.” That’s a choice no parent should have to make. Does Mitt Romney agree?

Women are now half of all workers on U.S. payrolls and breadwinners or co-breadwinners in nearly two-thirds of all families. Their incomes are sorely needed to provide basic economic security for their families.

Yet the U.S. also faces high rates of work-family conflict with few laws to support working families. One of the biggest culprits is workers’ lack of paid sick days to care for themselves, an elderly parent, or a sick kid – an issue that has been largely absent in the election debates.

Forty percent of private sector workers and 80 percent of low-wage workers do not have a single, paid sick day to recover from a short-term illness or to provide care for their loved ones.

via Does Mitt Romney Support Paid Sick Days? | ThinkProgress.

 April 14, 2012  Posted by at 6:26 pm No Responses »
 

By Daisy Grewal (Scientific American) A 2009 study demonstrated that after a short interaction with an attractive woman, men experienced a decline in mental performance. A more recent study suggests that this cognitive impairment takes hold even when men simply anticipate interacting with a woman who they know very little about.

In one experiment, just telling a man he would be observed by a female was enough to hurt his psychological performance.

Sanne Nauts and her colleagues at Radboud University Nijmegen in the Netherlands ran two experiments using men and women university students as participants. They first collected a baseline measure of cognitive performance by having the students complete a Stroop test. Developed in 1935 by the psychologist John Ridley Stroop, the test is a common way of assessing our ability to process competing information.

Men who thought a woman was observing them ended up performing worse. This cognitive impairment occurred even though the men had not interacted with the female observer.

Women’s performance did not differ, regardless of whether they were expecting a man or woman to observe them. But men who had been told a woman would observe them ended up doing much worse on the second Stroop task. Thus, simply anticipating the opposite sex interaction was enough to interfere with men’s cognitive functioning.

via Why Interacting with a Woman Can Leave Men “Cognitively Impaired”: Scientific American.

 March 16, 2012  Posted by at 12:12 pm No Responses »
 

By Scoutmaster (FreeRepublic.com) When Rush Limbaugh called Fluke a “slut” and a “prostitute” repeatedly over the course of four days, he constantly made specific allegations about what Fluke had said. Among the four days of comments, Limbaugh said Fluke was “a woman who is happily presenting herself as an immoral, baseless, no-purpose-to-her life woman.” Which is odd, because Fluke never spoke of her own life. Rush claimed Fluke had testified that “she’s having so much sex she can’t pay for it,” although Fluke never said she was having sex or using contraceptives. Limbaugh said things like:

What does it say about the college coed Susan Fluke [sic], who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex? What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex.

None of the statements about her sex life that Limbaugh attributed to Fluke were true, because Fluke never spoke about her sex life or her use of contraceptives. But Limbaugh repeatedly called Fluke a “slut,” and a “prostitiute” based on her statements that he made up. Rush blew it. He made hours of specific demeaning (at least to conservatives) allegations about what Fluke said, and those allegations weren’t true. And he called her insults (at least to conservatives) based on the false statements he attributed to her.
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), a public figure suing for defamation must prove that that the defendant/publisher had ‘actual malice,’ which means the defendant must have known that the statement was false or acted in reckless disregard of its truth or falsity.

Was Sandra Fluke a public figure? Simply appearing before Congress, or appearing in the public, isn’t enough to make one a public figure. If Sandra Fluke had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress and had been required to make her statements as testimony, she almost certainly would not have been a public figure. Fluke also wasn’t a standard public figure at the time she gave her presentation because she hadn’t earned that role by being ‘pervasively’ in the news. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 345.

So . . . I’d love to hear some experts in the area of defamation of public figures weigh in, but my quick-and-dirty is that if Fluke were not a public figure, it’s clear that Limbaugh defamed her repeatedly.

via Will Sandra Fluke Sue Rush Limbaugh (Vanity).

[Note: the comments have much less pig grunting than previous threads on the topic and a very persuasive argument that if Fluke sues Limbaugh he is likely to lose. This is the best legal opinion I've read so far.  --JS]
via Will Sandra Fluke Sue Rush Limbaugh (Vanity).

[Note: the comments have much less pig grunting than previous threads on the topic and a very persuasive argument that if Fluke sues Limbaugh he is likely to lose. This is the best legal opinion I've read so far.  --JS]

 March 5, 2012  Posted by at 7:43 pm No Responses »
 

By Paul Krassner (Huffington Post) Jim Jones, founder of the 8,000-member People’s Temple in San Francisco, once asked Margo St. James, founder of the prostitutes’ rights group, COYOTE (Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics), how he could obtain political power.

She answered, sardonically, “Arrange for some of your women to have sex with the bigwigs.”

It was well known around City Hall that Moscone had a predilection for black women. Police almost arrested him once with a black prostitute in a car at a supermarket parking lot.

Soon after the Dan White trial, Lee Cole, an ex-Scientologist I had met in Chicago while researching the Charles Manson case, took me to see Lowell Streiker, author of The Cults Are Coming! and a deprogrammer who had counseled one-third of the Jonestown survivors. In the course of our conversation, I mentioned my theory that Jim Jones had served as a pimp at City Hall and maintained power by implied blackmail.

Dr. Streiker told me of his friend — a member of Jones’ planning commission — who had told him about the technique that People’s Temple had used on Mayor Moscone. They sent a young black female member to service him, as a gift, then called the next week about a serious problem — she had lied, said she was eighteen, when in fact she was underage, but don’t worry, we have it under control — just the way J. Edgar Hoover used to manipulate top politicians with his juicy FBI files.

So Jim Jones had taken Margo St. James’ sardonic advice after all, on how to achieve political power: “Arrange for some of your women to have sex with the bigwigs.” And he had taken it all the way to a mass suicide-murder — which occurred simultaneously with a mass demonstration by the women’s movement in San Francisco, called “Take Back the Night!”

Paul Krassner’s dialogue with Andrew Breitbart appears in the December issue of Playboy.

via Paul Krassner: Sex, Corruption and the Kool-Aid Massacre.

 November 25, 2011  Posted by at 9:21 am No Responses »
 

By Jules Siegel (Moronia) Anthony Weiner’s wife came home and told him to quit. He immediately complied. I can get behind that. If he persisted, she would have had to share the consequences. She would have it on him forever. This way, when she gets annoyed about his hanging around in his underwear surfing the Web instead of looking for a job, well, she did insist that their life together was more important than his career. He will never have to mention this. It will always be there. Every marriage must have grudge tokens like this to maintain the balance of power.

But what life together? Cynics like me ask where she was when he was alone in his office seeking companionship online. I remember when couples used to actually live together. I guess it’s more exciting meeting in hotel rooms when their paths cross. Also, you don’t have to deal with the sheets and towels.

There’s a huge generational divide on Weinergate. The general opinion I’m reading in forums mainly populated by youth such as Fark.com and Reddit.com is that Weiner was an idiot for not realizing that his private Twitter messages could easily become public, as well as for lying about this when it first broke. Only right wing trolls think there was anything wrong with what he did, other than betraying his wife in a very trivial way. It’s rumored that he lied to President Obama about it, too, even more stupid, because Obama was his best hope for lenient treatment.

The political consequences are serious. The Democratic Party party is bleeding older white men. One of the main reasons is that it has become identified too closely with feminists and women’s studies type, who have far too much power. Now it embarks on driving away young white men (and many women). Weiner was one of their most popular politicians, admired for his giant clanging brass balls.

Nancy Pelosi and Debbie Wasserman Schultz are perceived as castrating feminist bitches by many men. I don’t think they are bitches. This is the end result of feminism, the desexualization of the American male. They are going to display Weiner’s balls in the Capitol RotundNot safe for work or family viewinga as an encouragement to the others. They will cast them in bell metal, like giant baby shoes, and add clappers. They will be called the Captivity Bells.

Despite this, Weinergate will continue to fascinate the punditocracy.The lamest scandal in American political history still has lots of clicks, not to speak of lulz. Please leave sex out of this. Profound moral issues at stake. It is definitely a major civics lesson. Consider Ginger Lee, one of Weiner’s six known sexting partners (if you leave out the fact that they were not sexting, that is).

I did an image search for her name. Eek! Not safe for work or family viewing. Don’t click that link if you are easily shocked or are at work or where your significant other can see your screen.

My computer is in the living room. No dear, I am not surfing the web for porn; just doing some political research.

Whew.

So here’s a lady who is famed for being utterly lewd in public for pay. Weiner exchanges a hundred or so text messages with her about — are you reading this or looking at the pictures? — politics.

In a few of them, he flirts a bit — unsuccessfully — and mentions his “package.” She puns about getting Weiner in the morning to her Twitter followers. Tee-hee. I am going to start a competing service called Titter, for people who like to snicker. Is Titter magazine still in business? Hmm.

No pictures are exchanged, no sexting.

Politics.

While I think the congressman is to be commended for talking with people in all walks of life outside the Beltway, others disagree. That was ok for another Jewish boy named Jesus. [Hey, Jules, can we get a swimming pool boy joke in here somewhere?]

When the story broke, she claims he told her to lie. Now this concerned citizen is stepping forward as her civic duty demand his resignation because he is a LIAR!

Oh, by the way, she’ll be performing at the Los Angeles Pussy Cat Club at three times her usual rate. Um, maybe it’s not called the Pussy Cat Club, but it is definitely a place for baring the flesh. A sharp-eyed reader has informed me that it is the Pink Lady in Atlanta. Well, OK then. I am afraid to do any more research myself. It’s wonderful to see people move up in life, though. Is this a great country or what?

 June 16, 2011  Posted by at 1:39 pm No Responses »
 

By Mona Charen (Creators.com) You have to be living in a dream world not to face the other reality of co-ed wrestling: It puts the boy at a disadvantage.

Not only is any well brought up young man going to hesitate to use his full strength against a young lady, he is also going to have to be so, so careful about where he touches her. The genital areas of both sexes are off limits, obviously. But girls also have breasts. So the boys have to be very careful not to grab the girl in such a way as might cause his hands to touch her breasts if she moves in an unexpected direction. One finger slip and the wrestler becomes a sexual harasser, no? The girl, by contrast, can push and shove and grab the upper body of her opponent without impediment.

Supporters of co-ed wrestling insist that sex is the last thing on the kids’ minds when they’re in the arena, which is almost certainly false. These are, after all, teenagers.

via Should Boys Be Wrestling Girls? by Mona Charen on Creators.com – A Syndicate Of Talent.

 March 1, 2011  Posted by at 10:39 am No Responses »
 

By Gail Collins (NY Times) Is Michele Bachmann the new Sarah Palin? And do we really need a new Sarah Palin? Shouldn’t the first one be made to go away before we start considering replacements?

Read the rest:  Don’t Know Much About History – NYTimes.com.

 January 29, 2011  Posted by at 6:23 am No Responses »
 

Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 7, 2010

Julia Heiman , now director of the famed Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction at Indiana University in Bloomington,  is in the process of publishing results from a multi-year study looking at the relationship satisfaction of men and women from five countries who’ve been married more than 20 years.

In men she found that a number of factors could predict relationship satisfaction, including health, sexual functioning and intimacies like kissing and cuddling. In women, only sexual functioning — level of desire, frequency of arousal and orgasm — seemed to predict satisfaction. That, Heiman says, “was really different from what we expected.”

Read the rest: After three decades, Julia Heiman’s still demystifying sex.

 November 7, 2010  Posted by at 12:08 pm No Responses »
 

By Lauren Smiley (SF Weekly) A San Francisco non-profit that helps previously incarcerated women burned a $100,000 check from Craigslist this week in a ritual ceremony, saying accepting the money would be profiting “from a place of exploitation of girls.”

The Center for Young Women’s Development received the unsolicited check last Friday at their Folsom Street office, said executive director Marlene Sanchez. After much discussion and a phone conversation with Craigslist, the staff burned the check on Monday. Craigslist couldn’t be immediately contact for comment Thursday about their donation going up in flames.

Read the rest Craigslist’s $100K Donation Burned By Women’s Group – San Francisco News – The Snitch.

 September 18, 2010  Posted by at 7:45 am No Responses »
 

By Lauren Smiley (SF Weekly) A San Francisco non-profit that helps previously incarcerated women burned a $100,000 check from Craigslist this week in a ritual ceremony, saying accepting the money would be profiting “from a place of exploitation of girls.”

The Center for Young Women’s Development received the unsolicited check last Friday at their Folsom Street office, said executive director Marlene Sanchez. After much discussion and a phone conversation with Craigslist, the staff burned the check on Monday. Craigslist couldn’t be immediately contact for comment Thursday about their donation going up in flames.

Read the rest Craigslist’s $100K Donation Burned By Women’s Group – San Francisco News – The Snitch.

 September 18, 2010  Posted by at 7:45 am No Responses »